Our Stories
The quote used is by Niall Williams.
Cover Code is Modified Morse–Our Stories
Pages 1-3
Pages 4-6
Work in Progress
The code was stitched in wire; then oxidized.
Back Side Of Page 1
Page 1 Wire Removed
Completed Page 1 Attached with Safety Pins
The Code Layout
Pages 1 and 2
Pages 3 and 4
Pages 5 and 6
Notes During Process–
I have used the same oxidizing solution for years. Something interesting and unexpected happened when I was working on the pages for this piece. Rather than the typical rust color, this happened–
Never had a purple result. Curious why. I suspect it was because there was a chemical reaction between the salt (iodized) and the peroxide. I did some quick tests–salt and water on watercolor paper, salt and isopropyl alcohol on watercolor paper, and salt with peroxide on watercolor paper. Purple occurred with the salt and peroxide. Was the purple color not because of salt and peroxide but perhaps the watercolor paper binder? I tested the same three combinations on printer paper and drawing paper. Purple color occurred on all of the tests with peroxide and salt (iodized).
Even more curious; after the pages were dried in the sun, the purple color vanished. Brought to mind, the purple school glue that dries clear.
Still did not have the result I wanted, so I mixed up the oxidizing solution with sea salt. The result is the pages in the book.
Materials–Oxidized Canvas and watercolor paper, safety pins, fiber, paint, metal bead, wire for oxidation, oxidizing solution.
Scale–Closed: 5.5″ x 4.75″ x 1.25″ Open: 5.5″ x 26″ x .25″
Truth is not Negotiable Book
Cover Affixed to Book and Drying.
Modified Tap Code–Truth
Metal and Loom Knit Closure
Back of Book
Lined with Mulberry Paper
Modified Morse Code Used, Layered Vertically and Horizontally
Each Block is a Letter, Stitched onto Cardstock Lined with Rice Paper.
Page One–Truth
Blocks were Stitched onto the Book Pages. The Thread Was Run Horizontally Through the Corrugated Cardboard and Then Through the Page and Knotted.
Page Two and Three–Is Not
Page Four and Five-Negotiable
Letterlocked Notes on Work
Memorial
In 2018 on May 15th, my mother died. Every year I make a piece to remember my mother and her life.
The beads are from one of my mother’s necklaces.
Code for the word–Loss
Inside of the piece.
It can be free standing.
Code for my mother’s date of birth 02151930 and the date of her death 05152018.
The code for this page is 2025 and Unshed Tears for My Mother.
I knotted the green thread around the raw white linen. Each five knots is used to represent a dash. There are two dashes (M), space, three dashes (O), space, and two dashes (M).
Materials–
The green paper is painters’ paper. I had some paint left over from a piece. Rather than letting it go to waste, I printed it on a roll of paper. I used a parcel for the corrugated cardboard. The remaining materials are–watercolor paper, a few metal bits for the closure, beads from one of my mother’s necklace, and adhesive.
Scale–5.75″ x 4.75″ x .5″
A Couple of Weeds in My Garden
Vicia sativa
Tragopogon porrifolius
One of my favorite plants, not a weed–
Hibiscus trionum
The harvested seed was from several years ago. A pleasant surprise.
Thoughts on Video–8 Japanese Aesthetics That Might Change How You See Beauty
It is challenging to show the complete content of art books.
If the book is closed the content on the pages is concealed. If the book is open, the closure, cover, and remaining pages are not accessible.
Today I was watching a video on YouTube–
8 Japanese Aesthetics That Might Change How You See Beauty
I was struck by this passage–
Masayuki Kurokawa (Japanese architect and designer) explains that hiding part of a work is not about withholding. It’s an invitation.
The creator doesn’t expect the viewer to see the work exactly as they do. Instead, they hope the viewer will bring their own thoughts, feelings, and experiences, and in doing so, become part of the creative process. In this way, Japanese aesthetics do not always aim for precise communication.
There is no single correct interpretation.
Instead, there’s a quiet belief that something in the viewer’s heart will naturally resonate with the creator’s intention.
Art becomes complete through that shared experience, through presence, imagination, and mutual sensitivity.
I agree with the bit about the viewer bringing their own thoughts… I generally think of it as seeing the work through the filter of your own experiences.
I don’t agree that the viewer becomes part of the creative process, just by looking at the work. I feel that devalues the artist’s education, years of experience, the number of works constructed, and the work.
My interpretation is the correct one for my work. If someone views my work and arrives at a different interpretation; their interpretation is not equivalent to mine. Their interpretation is not valid.
For example, a viewer may appreciate a material used in one of my pieces but may not comprehend the importance of that material to the content. How can they possibly arrive at a valid interpretation of the work?
Hike South Hills SLO, CA
Plants seen today during hike South Hills in San Luis Obispo, CA.
All of the names came from Google AI. Some information wasn’t available or contradictory. Sorry if incorrect.
Viola pedunculata
Acmispon
Calystegia macrostegia
Chlorogalum pomeridianum
Dipterostemon
Dodecatheon
First time that I have ever seen them in this location. Unsuccessfully attempted to grow this plant in my garden.
Dodecatheon
Eschscholzia californica
Fritillaria biflora
Another plant that I’ve not seen in this location. Interesting that there was a single plant very near the trail.
Fritillaria biflora
Lathyrus vestitus with Bee
Lomatium macrocarpum
Phacelia
Phacelia
Plantago
Stachys bullata
Dudleya
Fungi in Flower Pot
All of the pots filled with our newly made compost have sprout fungi.
Agave
